S.48-49
The statutory base
Licensing under the Trade Marks Act
Trademark licensing is the grant of permission — exclusive or non-exclusive — to use your mark under Sections 48 and 49 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, ideally recorded as a registered user on Form TM-U, with quality-control terms that protect the mark's distinctiveness while it earns for you.
TRUSTED BY GROWING BRANDS
S.48-49
Licensing under the Trade Marks Act
TM-U
Statutory standing for the licensee
2 types
Plus sole — the choice shapes royalties
QC
No quality control = naked licensing risk
Trademark licensing is the grant of permission — exclusive or non-exclusive — by a trademark owner to another party to use the mark under Sections 48 and 49 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, ideally recorded with the Registry as a registered user on Form TM-U, with quality-control terms that protect the mark's distinctiveness. It is the one trademark service that is about making money: turning a mark you already own into a stream of royalty income from markets you may never enter yourself.
The structure you choose defines the economics. An exclusive license hands a single licensee the sole right within the agreed scope — even excluding you — and commands the highest royalty; a non-exclusive license lets you grant the same rights to many licensees and multiply the income; a sole license gives one licensee exclusivity but lets you keep using the mark too. Recording the licensee as a registered user on Form TM-U then matters because it gives them statutory standing — including, in defined circumstances, the ability to act against infringers — and puts the relationship on the public record.
The trap that ruins careless licensing is naked licensing: granting use without genuine quality control. Because a trademark exists to guarantee a consistent source and quality, letting a licensee use it unchecked can render the mark deceptive or non-distinctive — and expose it to rectification. This is also where licensing must be distinguished from assignment: licensing rents the brand while you keep ownership and control; assignment sells it outright. Done right, with quality control and proper recording, licensing grows your brand's reach without ever loosening your grip on it.

Licensing fits any owner whose brand can travel further than they can. These are the situations where it pays off.
A franchise is a structured brand license at its core. We build the trademark backbone — license, quality control, and registered-user recording — that lets a franchisor grant controlled rights to franchisees, collect royalties, and enforce standards across every outlet without ever surrendering ownership of the name.
A direct-to-consumer brand can license its mark to a manufacturer to produce under the name. We draft the license with tight quality control and inspection rights so the goods stay on-brand, protecting both the mark's distinctiveness and the reputation customers associate with it.
A brand expanding into new regions can license a local distributor to use the mark in that territory. We define the territorial scope, royalty basis, and quality terms so the distributor grows your presence where you do not operate — without acquiring rights beyond what you granted.
When a family business is divided across entities, the shared brand needs clear, enforceable terms for who may use it and how. We structure inter-entity licenses with defined scope and quality control, so the mark is used consistently and ownership disputes are pre-empted rather than litigated later.
If your mark is registered in classes you do not actively trade in, those classes can earn. We license the mark for the dormant goods or services — to a partner who does operate there — generating royalty income from rights that would otherwise sit idle on your registration.
A business about to invest in building a licensed brand needs certainty that its rights are real and durable. We secure the licensee's position — clear scope, registered-user recording on TM-U, and protection against premature termination — so the investment rests on enforceable, recorded rights.
A trademark license lives or dies on four sets of terms. Get these right and the brand earns safely; get them wrong and the mark itself is at risk.
The clause that keeps the mark alive. Real quality standards plus the right to inspect and audit the licensee's goods or services prevent naked licensing — and the rectification risk that comes with it. Without genuine control, the law may treat the mark as no longer a true badge of origin.
Exactly where, and for what goods or services, the licensee may use the mark. A precise scope clause lets you license a region or a dormant class while retaining everything else, and stops the licensee from quietly expanding into markets and categories you never agreed to hand over.
How you get paid, and how you verify it. A defined royalty computation — percentage, fixed fee, or per-unit — paired with an audit right turns a vague promise into an enforceable income stream, so the licensee cannot under-report and you can check the numbers behind every payment.
How the relationship ends, cleanly. Clear termination triggers, a defined post-termination obligation to stop using the mark, and an agreed sell-off period for existing stock let you exit when trust breaks down — without an ex-licensee continuing to trade on your name indefinitely.
Six steps that turn a brand you own into a controlled, royalty-bearing asset.
We work through your intent — exclusive or non-exclusive, territory, classes, royalty model, and control needs — so the agreement reflects a real commercial deal, not a generic template.
We draft the license with the four clause sets that matter — quality control, scope, royalty, and term — written to protect the mark and to hold up if the relationship is tested.
We guide execution and correct stamping for the relevant state, so the agreement is valid and admissible in evidence should a dispute ever arise.
We file Form TM-U to record the licensee as a registered user, giving them statutory standing and putting the licensing relationship on the public record.
We set up a calendar for royalty payments, audits, and renewal milestones, so the income and the obligations are tracked rather than forgotten.
We help maintain the quality-control records and inspections the license requires, keeping the mark's distinctiveness — and your protection against rectification — intact over time.
The brand-usage guidelines feed directly into the quality-control annexure — the part of the agreement that keeps your mark distinctive and immune to a naked-licensing challenge. The richer your standards, the stronger the control clause we can draft around them.
A loose license can lose you royalties, standing, or the mark itself. Here is how we engineer each risk out.
An informal arrangement has no enforceable quality control, leaving the mark vulnerable to a naked-licensing challenge.
We put it in a written agreement with real quality-control and inspection clauses.
Without TM-U recording the licensee has no statutory standing, and disputes over the license become messy.
We file Form TM-U so the registered user is on record with recognised rights.
An undefined royalty basis invites under-reporting and underpayment with no way to verify the numbers.
We define the computation and add an audit right so every payment is checkable.
When the relationship sours, an ex-licensee keeps trading on the mark with no clean exit available.
We draft termination and sell-off mechanics upfront so you can end it cleanly.
Clear answers on licensing vs assignment, exclusive vs non-exclusive, registered users and TM-U, naked licensing, royalties, stamp duty, franchising, and termination.
We structure the license, draft the quality-control terms, and record the registered user — so your mark earns royalties without losing its strength.
Sections 48-49 · TM-U recording · quality control · royalties